Schmudget Blog
— filed under: ,

Four-Year Budgeting: Unreliable Long-Term Forecasts Could Harm Public Priorities

Posted by Andy Nicholas at Apr 09, 2012 04:35 PM |
Filed under: ,

Part Three in a Series on Washington's Long-Term Fiscal Challenges

Without the ability to address Washington’s flawed revenue system, current proposals requiring the budget to be balanced over four years (instead of the current two year cycle) would force policymakers to cut important public health and education priorities over the long term.  A major reason is that long-term revenue forecasts tend to be highly unreliable.

As we noted in parts one and two of this series, balanced state budgets are key to maintaining important priorities in the long run. However, economic uncertainty makes it extremely difficult for forecasters to develop reliable long-term revenue estimates.

The graph below shows that forecasters tend to be overly conservative when estimating revenue growth following a recession and overly optimistic during an economic peak. Following the “dot-com bust” recession of the early 2000s, the state Economic and Revenue Forecast Council (ERFC) under-estimated state tax collections by about $2.8 billion prior to the 2005-07 budget cycle.

LT_rev_forecast


Under current budgeting practices, it is entirely appropriate for the ERFC to be extremely cautious when projecting state revenues following a recession. However, under the proposed four-year balanced budget requirements this approach could harm public investments by creating a “ratchet effect.” 

That means overly pessimistic forecasts would require policymakers to enact unnecessarily deep cuts to public health and education infrastructure in order to keep the budget balanced within the depressed revenue estimates. And, deeper-than-necessary cuts to these and other vital components of the state economy would greatly harm the state’s ability to recover following a recession.

The “ratchet effect” would be less severe if the legislature were able to raise additional revenues, which would increase the revenue forecast and mitigate the need for excessive cuts. Yet the onerous, minority rule requirement established under I-1053 makes it virtually impossible for the legislature to meaningfully increase revenues under current law.

Without the ability to address Washington’s flawed revenue system, proposals to mandate a four-year balanced budget would simply force policymakers to abandon our commitments to building a robust and vibrant state economy.

This is the third post in a series on Washington’s long-term fiscal challenges. Be sure to check out parts one and two. More to come.

Document Actions
HIGHLIGHTS

Policy Agenda

We have released Framework for Prosperity, a comprehensive policy agenda for the 2013-2015 biennium. We make specific recommendations for targeted investments that would bring our state closer to providing prosperity for all Washingtonians. We also provide revenue options to help pay for those investments. Click on the image below to download a PDF of the agenda.

 

cover

 

Catch the Budget Beat

During the 2013 legislative session we will host regular Budget Beat calls and and podcaBudget Beatsts to bring you updates and breaking news from Olympia, timely policy analysis, and share resources and upcoming community events.

Check out the archive of Budget Beat calls and podcasts. 

Join the Budget Beat calls every other Friday at noon!  

Budget Matters 2012

Our first annual policy conference was a great success! More than 300 people came together to hear from policy makers, national and state policy experts, and community leaders from around the state. Our special lunch speaker was Van Jones.

Van jones at Budget Matters 

Here are some of the PowerPoint presentations from the break-out panels.

-The Affordable Care Act: Maximizing the Opportunities

-Building a Prosperity Economy in Washington State

-Building a 21st Century Revenue System

-Effective Messaging Strategies

For pictures and more information, check out our event page.