Schmudget Blog

Three Reasons Why a New Tax Break for Manufacturers Is Bad for Washington State

Posted by Andy Nicholas at Jul 03, 2017 06:50 PM |
Filed under: State Budget, Tax Break

In the final hours of intense, behind-the-scenes negotiations over the recently enacted 2017-19 state budget, lawmakers in Washington state snuck in a major new tax break for manufacturers. This new tax break, which is one of 13 new or extended tax breaks included in Senate Bill 5977, would reduce the business and occupation (B&O) tax rate applied to Washington state-based manufacturers from the current rate of 0.484 percent to 0.2904 percent over the next four years. 

This Senate tax break bill is one of several bills that still need to be signed by Governor Inslee in order to become law. It is bad policy and it should not be enacted. Here are three reasons why:

  1. Once fully implemented, the new break will eliminate $39 million per year in funding that would otherwise support schools, health care, and other investments that form the foundation of a strong state economy. Structuring this tax break to gradually phase in allowed lawmakers to balance the state budget over the next four years. But after 2022, the mounting costs of this tax break will make it ever more difficult to balance the budget and adequately fund schools and other priorities.
  2. It includes no accountability to the public. It’s unacceptable that lawmakers neglected to apply any of the standard transparency and accountability provisions applied to other recently enacted tax breaks to this tax break – such as identifying a specific public purpose or goal, designating metrics to assess its success or failure in achieving those goals, or setting an expiration date.
  3. It will largely benefit shareholders and out-of-state consumers. The new tax break might allow manufacturers to very modestly reduce the prices of the goods they sell, but that would mostly benefit consumers in other states and countries where those goods are primarily sold. Manufacturers could also use the tax savings to pad their profits for the benefit of their own shareholders. Either way, that means millions of dollars in resources that would otherwise be used to support communities throughout Washington state will be diverted to other states and countries.

McCleary Reality Check: Legitimate Solutions Required to Fully Fund Schools

This is the second in a series of schmudget blog posts about property taxes in Washington state and the role they play in funding basic K-12 education. 

By Kelli Smith, policy analyst, and Andy Nicholas, associate director of fiscal policy

Complying with the state Supreme Court’s McCleary mandate to develop a dependable source of revenue to fund our K-12 schools should be lawmakers’ top priority when they gather in Olympia early next year. Lawmakers must not waste time promoting non-starter proposals like “revenue-neutral property tax levy swaps” that would generate none of the additional resources needed to build the education system our kids need to thrive. 

Under its 2012 McCleary decision, the Washington State Supreme Court ruled that it is the state’s duty to fully fund basic K-12 education. Yet school districts in our state have for years been relying on local property tax levy dollars to provide students with the basics that the state is supposed to be providing – such as textbooks, school supplies, transportation, salaries for teachers and nurses, and other essentials. Because of this, the court ruled that the state is failing in its paramount duty to fund education for all of Washington’s schoolchildren. 

To be clear, the court did not rule that local levies have to be reduced or eliminated. These levies can be kept in place to support the multiple services our schools provide beyond a basic education, such as after-school clubs and advanced placement programs. 

But opponents of providing new forms of revenue to pay for schools have been promoting the idea that local levies must be reduced or eliminated in order to fulfill the requirements of McCleary. And instead of finding equitable and dependable new sources of revenue to fulfill their duty, these lawmakers are fixating on revenue-neutral levy swap proposals. As we wrote previously, these swaps are complex shell games involving increases to the state property tax levy and decreases to local school districts’ levies. They generate no new resources overall.

Funding the basics can and should be accomplished with additional state revenue. In fact, in his July 2016 brief to the court, the state attorney general, who represents the legislature and the state government in the McCleary case, points out the various ways the legislature could fully fund basic education. The brief references numerous revenue proposals including taxing high-end capital gains, modifying a damaging law that restricts property tax revenue growth to a maximum of 1 percent per year, eliminating wasteful corporate tax breaks, and increasing the state property tax levy. 

The McCleary ruling is an enormous opportunity for policymakers to get to work on building a world-class education system for all of Washington’s children. The current levy swap proposals are intended to distract the legislature from making the most of this opportunity. Our kids will only get the education they deserve when lawmakers refocus on generating significant new tax revenues from equitable sources.


Slight Boost in Projected Tax Revenues Won’t Fix School Funding Crisis

Posted by Andy Nicholas at Sep 21, 2016 08:20 PM |

Although the newest state revenue projections anticipate a modest increase in available tax resources in the coming years, that uptick is minuscule compared to the billions of additional dollars needed to fund schools in Washington state.

In its September forecast, the Washington State Economic and Revenue Forecast Council projects that state tax revenues will increase, relative to the previous forecast, by $336 million (0.9 percent) for the remainder of the current two-year budget cycle ending in June 2017. In the next budget cycle, for 2017-2019, the council projects that state tax resources will increase by $134 million (0.3 percent). (1) These increases are largely attributable to higher-than-expected revenues from the sales tax and taxes on the sale of real estate.

Despite this boost in tax revenues, the council’s projections show that our state rainy day fund and other reserves will remain dangerously low at the end of the current budget cycle. They also show total budget reserves will be at about $1.8 billion by June 2017. That’s approximately 9.5 percent of annual state spending on public services, far below the 15 percent cushion that many economists and public finance experts recommend to ensure that schools, health care, and other important investments can be maintained when a recession or other state emergency strikes.

Lawmakers can’t depend on modest growth in existing tax resources to build the world-class education system that Washington’s kids will need to compete in this 21st century economy. To fulfill their obligation to our schoolchildren as mandated by the state Supreme Court, lawmakers must focus on raising additional new revenues from equitable sources. 

1. The revenue numbers reflect total state-only Near General Fund + Education Legacy Trust Fund + Opportunity Pathways Account


Funding Schools for Washington’s Kids Can’t Be Done through Property Tax Gimmicks

This is the first in a series of schmudget blog posts about property taxes in Washington state and the role they play in funding basic K-12 education. 

By Kelli Smith, policy analyst, and Andy Nicholas, associate director of fiscal policy

In the upcoming 2017 legislative session, Washington state lawmakers have an important opportunity to help all schoolchildren. In order to provide Washington’s kids with the opportunity for a future that includes better jobs, more civic engagement, and greater economic security, legislators must provide the resources needed to improve basic public education, as defined in the State Supreme Court’s McCleary decision – while also making other key investments that support thriving communities. 

Yes, it’s a tall order, requiring billions of dollars annually in additional resources. But it can and must be done for the sake of Washington’s future. And it must be done in a way that protects investments in priorities that help Washingtonians who are struggling to make ends meet – especially those investments that help ameliorate the effects of systemic racism and other structural barriers to opportunity. 

State and local property tax levies supply a foundation of funding for K-12 education in Washington state. A number of proposals involving changes to property tax levies have been introduced by state policymakers in the last few years. Few of these proposals would tackle the real challenges involved in ensuring we have adequate funding for schools, however.

So-called “revenue-neutral levy swaps” – shell games involving increases to the state property tax levy accompanied by decreases to local school districts’ levies – would generate no additional overall resources for schools. And though some lawmakers argue that a levy swap is necessary for the legislature to fulfill the mandate of the Supreme Court, the reality is that replacing local levies with the state levy won’t provide the funding to address the court’s primary concern – helping every kid in Washington state to get a top-quality education. 

Lawmakers must address the real barrier to creating the education system our kids deserve: a deeply inequitable state and local tax system that not only overly relies on the people least able to pay taxes, but that also doesn’t provide adequate revenue to support schools and other public priorities.

Before upending the current balance between the state and local levies, lawmakers should adopt more comprehensive solutions and work to make the overall property tax system a more equitable and reliable source of funds for schools and other priorities. The legislature should enact the following common-sense reforms to benefit all schoolchildren:

  • Enact property tax credits specifically designed to reduce taxes for lower-income and middle-income homeowners as well as renters who can’t afford higher property tax bills that get passed down to them through higher rents.
  • Eliminate the damaging law that restricts property tax revenue growth to 1 percent per year (or the rate of inflation, whichever is lower), which saps billions of dollars from schools. 
  • Remove the rigid “ten-dollar limit,” which makes it difficult for some cities and counties to meet needs for emergency services, public safety, parks, and other priorities by arbitrarily limiting the sum of all regular levies (those that do not have to be reauthorized by voters on an ongoing basis) to $10 per $1,000 of assessed property value. 
  • Raise the state property tax levy, which at $2 per $1,000 of assessed value, is near record lows. This would equitably generate additional revenue for schools throughout Washington state. 

Making these changes would be a key step toward fixing our state’s broken and inequitable tax system. And it would provide significant additional funding to help the legislature give Washington’s kids the high-quality schools they deserve. 

Future posts in this series will explain these important property tax reforms in more detail. They will also examine the strengths and weaknesses of Washington state’s property tax system as an instrument for funding basic K-12 education. Our analysis of each proposal will take into account the need for racial and gender equity. 


All Income Growth is Going to the Richest 1 Percent of Washingtonians

It’s time for policymakers in Washington state to take steps to reverse decades of widening economic disparities that threaten broad prosperity, now that it has again been shown that all income growth since 2009 continues to flow to the wealthiest Washingtonians.

An updated report from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) shows that the richest 1 percent of households – those making over $388,000 a year – captured all of the new income generated in Washington state between 2009 and 2013 (see graph). By contrast, and in a stark reversal from past decades, average incomes among the remaining 99 percent of Washingtonians declined during this period, causing far too many hardworking families to fall even further behind.


The richest 1 percent of Washingtonians didn’t always reap such an outsized share of income gains during periods of economic growth. Prior to 1980, the 99 percent typically captured at least 80 percent of all income gains during economic expansions.

Further, as the EPI report points out, it used to be considered outrageous for executives to receive multimillion dollar salaries and outsized bonuses while laying off workers. Today, as the vast majority of working people and families in Washington state continue to struggle, super-rich CEOs living here are doing better than ever. In fact, in 2015, the CEO of Washington state-based Expedia received the highest pay ($94.6 million) of any corporate chief executive in the county.

It has become abundantly clear in recent years that everyday Americans and Washingtonians are tired of the economic inequality that has become the norm. In our state, we need policies that help all communities thrive by strengthening employment and creating more living-wage jobs. We need to make sure our tax code doesn’t favor the wealthy and the politically connected over the common good.

In fact, our upside-down tax system – where Washingtonians with the lowest incomes pay seven times as much in state and local taxes as a share of their income than the richest 1 percent – makes it even harder for the 99 percent to get ahead.   

Building a stronger Washington economy requires greater economic equality and overall equity. Lawmakers must undo the systemic inequities that have created gaps in opportunity for many people of color to receive good jobs and living-wage salaries.

In Washington state:

  • Voters can help advance economic equality and close the opportunity gap if Initiative 1433, now gathering signatures, makes it on the November ballot and passes. It would incrementally raise the minimum wage to $13.50 over four years, increasing the take-home pay for 730,000 people working across a range of sectors. It would also provide paid sick leave, so parents don’t lose wages when they need to take care of themselves or their children when they’re sick.
  • Lawmakers during the 2017 legislative session must pass the capital gains tax recently proposed by Governor Inslee and leaders in the State House, which has been endorsed by major papers and many community groups throughout our state. And they should use the revenue from capital gains to invest in education, health care, and other services that expand economic opportunities for everyone.

And as lawmakers work to craft policies that seek to provide economic opportunity to Washingtonians, they must be especially mindful that those policies empower those who have been most harmed by racism and other structural inequalities that fuel the rise in economic inequality.

Senate Budget Includes Massive Tax Giveaway to Giant Media Corporations

Posted by Andy Nicholas at Mar 16, 2016 05:25 PM |
Filed under: State Budget, Tax Break
corrected version*

Those who believe that the $57 million in new tax resources included in the Washington State Senate's latest budget proposal represents a significant compromise in the ongoing budget negotiations are in for a big disappointment.

The new resources are no compromise from the Senate leaders’ rigid position of being against any new taxes to support schools and other priorities. Rather, they are a one-time payoff from large TV, cable, and media companies in exchange for a permanent tax cut that in the years ahead will cost the state millions of dollars that could have been used to help build a stronger economy.

Worse, this sweetheart tax deal sets a troubling precedent: It rewards businesses that don’t fulfill their civic duties and that evade paying the taxes that are needed to support safe communities, public infrastructure, and other investments that benefit all Washingtonians.

For at least the past six years, many large national media companies that supply TV shows, movies, and other content to local broadcast stations have been dodging Business & Occupation (B&O) taxes on their advertising and royalty-income-generating activities in Washington state.

Before 2010, these and certain other businesses were able to avoid paying taxes on their activities in Washington state if they had no employees, agents soliciting sales, or property located here. In 2010, lawmakers wisely plugged that tax loophole, requiring these businesses to pay taxes on the portion of their incomes generated in our state.

But many large TV and cable companies failed to comply, avoiding about $11 million per year in B&O taxes tied to their Washington-based advertising activities, according to estimates from the state Department of Revenue. And now there is a threat of legal action from national media conglomerates doing business in Washington state that would seek to prevent the Department from collecting their unpaid taxes and enforcing the law in the future.

Senate Bill 6665 –  heard in the Senate Ways & Means Committee on March 11 along with the Senate’s latest budget proposal – would reward these businesses for shirking their responsibilities to Washington state. Companies in the mix would likely include multibillion-dollar corporations like Comcast-NBCUniversal and Fox Broadcasting Company.

Under the proposal, all fines and penalties assessed on unpaid taxes from June 2010 to July 2016 would be waived for any business that pays by October 2016. And the actual amount the companies owe in unpaid taxes from that time period would be cut in half.(1) Their tax responsibility moving forward would also be cut in half.

The upshot is that under SB 6665 there would be a one-time, $57 million boost in B&O tax revenues in our state from national media corporations as they rush to take advantage of a massive giveaway of public money that they’d be crazy to turn down. The deal allows them to pay a mere fraction of their total unpaid tax bills now and receive a large permanent reduction later.

Far from being a needed breakthrough that would enable policymakers to make real progress on addressing the many challenges communities face across our state, the latest Senate budget is really just more of the same: unsustainable gimmicks and wasteful tax breaks for large, profitable corporations that don’t need them.

(1) Under current law, these companies are required to pay B&O taxes on about 2.2 percent of their total nationwide advertising income, which amounts to an estimated $730 million per year, according to the Department of Revenue. But SB 6665 would permanently cap their Washington portion at 1.1 percent, or $360 million per year. Their cumulative tax bills on advertising revenue would be reduced from about $11 million per year to $5.6 million.

 *The original version of this post incorrectly stated that any taxes national media companies owed to Washington state from before January 2012 would be entirely forgiven under SB 6665.

Essential Revenue Reforms Lose Out to Short-Term Needs in House Budget

Posted by Andy Nicholas at Feb 23, 2016 02:00 AM |
Filed under: State Budget

The 2016 budget proposal from the Washington State House of Representatives offers a number of solid recommendations for maintaining existing investments and addressing short-term priorities for Washington’s economy. Missing from the budget is a focus on the long-term – and the kinds of common-sense revenue reforms that are necessary for our state to fully fund K-12 schools and reform its flawed tax system.


In addition to making adjustments to compensate for changes in projected costs, the House budget would allocate more than $500 million in new funding toward important priorities. For example:

  • Education: ($222 million): The budget partially addresses the K-12 teacher shortage in our state by increasing pay among first-year teachers to $40,000 from $35,000 per year. It would also increase bonuses for teachers that attain professional certifications and help retain pay for custodians, para-educators, and other essential school workers. In higher education, it would add funding to help aspiring students from families with lower incomes go to college. A program that helps communities with low property values raise enough resources to adequately fund local schools also receives a temporary boost of $90.5 million.
  • Healthy People ($136 million): To comply with court mandates regarding mental health services in Washington state, some funds would go to improve the quality of patient care and to ensure the safety of staff at state mental hospitals. The budget would also include funding for 25.5 additional registered nurse positions at Western State Hospital. Funding would also be added for four new facilities around the state, each able to serve about 17 patients at a time. Additional funds would be allocated to help patients stay in stable, secure housing while getting treatment or recovering.
  • Healthy Environment ($150 million): Like Governor Inslee’s proposed budget in December, the House’s budget would add significant new resources to compensate for 2015’s unusually bad wildfire season and to bolster efforts to prevent similarly devastating fires in the coming years.
  • Homelessness mitigation ($45 million): Given the dire circumstances around homelessness in communities throughout Washington state, the House budget provides $37.4 million to help people who are homeless find stable, secure housing. Grants would also be allocated to public schools that find effective ways to help students who are homeless get the assistance they need and to stay in school.

To pay for the teacher salary increases and other K-12 enhancements, House leaders sensibly propose to raise about $120 million per year in additional revenues by closing or narrowing six wasteful tax breaks. They include a Real Estate Excise Tax exemption on properties sold at foreclosure claimed by banks; a sales tax exemption claimed by shoppers from other states; a sales tax exemption on bottled water; and preferential business tax rates claimed by prescription drug wholesalers, international banks, travel agents, and tour operators.

Challenges and Missed Opportunities

While House leaders’ effort to narrow tax breaks is a good start, it still won’t raise enough revenue to provide the funding needed to fund K-12 education as mandated by the State Supreme Court. What’s more, the budget writers miss a big opportunity to reform Washington state’s upside-down tax system – in which the people with the lowest incomes pay a much higher percentage in taxes than the wealthiest 1 percent. The policymakers should have proposed common-sense reforms, including the capital gains tax they championed last year.

Instead, their budget relies on draining budget reserves, transferring resources from other accounts, removing required expenditures from long-term projections, and other one-time actions to compensate for higher-than-anticipated needs for state services and lower-than-expected tax collections.

Furthermore, the House’s proposal to draw $530 million from budget reserves to pay for the wildfires and other pressing needs is risky. Doing so could make it difficult to maintain services that benefit all Washingtonians should the economy take a turn for the worse. By 2019, budget reserves will fall to less than three percent of annual state spending under this plan. That’s far below the 15 percent reserves recommended by most state fiscal experts and economists.

It is commendable that the House budget proposal maintains the investments previously enacted in the 2015-17 state budget and addresses important short-terms priorities that will help improve the well-being of many Washingtonians. But significant reforms to Washington’s tax system will still be needed to create a sustainable state budget that helps ensure our schools and our economy are strong.

Document Actions

Policy Summit You're InvitedSign Up and Save the Date!

We will host two Budget Matters policy summits this year – one in Spokane on October 31 (register now) and one in Seattle on December 6 (registration coming soon)! The Spokane summit, featuring Jared Bernstein of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, will focus on the impact of federal and state policy decisions on eastern Washington communities. The Seattle summit, featuring Glenn Harris of Race Forward, will examine what it would take to lift up everyone to advance progress in our state. Find out more.

Our Policy Priorities

Washington state should be a place where all our residents have strong communities, great schools, and the chance for a bright future. Our 2017-2019 Legislative Agenda outlines the priorities we are working to advance to build a better Washington.

Budget Beat!

Check out the Budget Beat webinars we hosted throughout the 2017 legislative session, including our most recent Budget Beat about federal budget proposals, featuring Louisa Warren of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, on our YouTube channel

Testimonies in Olympia

To advance our legislative priorities, the Budget & Policy Center team was in the state capitol throughout session testifying on a wide range of bills. Watch our testimonies on TVW:
Misha TVW