Schmudget Blog
— filed under:

Majority rules? Not this time.

Posted by Andy Nicholas at May 25, 2011 11:20 PM |
Filed under:

Yesterday, with a majority of members voting “Yea” (yes), the State House of Representatives passed a budget for the 2011-2013 biennium containing massive cuts to core public services like health care and education.  Yet hours later, a measure that would reign-in wasteful spending on a tax break for out-of-state banks to help fund K-3 education failed on the House Floor, even though it too received a majority vote.  How was the House able to cut one form of state spending with a majority vote but not another? The culprit is Initiative 1053.

Initiative 1053 and its predecessor I-960 have exacerbated the effects of the recession in our state by creating a distorted and irrational state budget process. Especially during times of crisis, it is imperative that all forms of state spending be transparently scrutinized and prioritized by policymakers.  However, by mandating a super majority (two-thirds) legislative vote for any action that increases state tax revenues, I-1053 effectively prohibits lawmakers from carefully examining state spending on special tax breaks. As a result, throughout the Great Recession elected officials have relied on excessive and on economically damaging cuts to health care, education, public safety, and other core public structures in order to balance the state budget.

The current state budget agreement vividly demonstrates this troubling dynamic.  As we noted yesterday, painful cuts to basic public services account for some 90 percent of proposed actions to address the $5 billion shortfall , the difference between projected tax revenues and the amount needed to maintain basic levels of services in the coming 2011-13 biennium.

Senator Ed Murray recently introduced legislation that would give voters the chance to create a more balanced and rational budget process in our state. Senate Bill 5944 would allow policymakers to modify state spending on narrow tax breaks via a simple majority vote of the legislature, if approved by voters on the November ballot. With only a few hours left until the end of the legislative session, it is unlikely that voters will be given the opportunity to make this important correction.

Related research:

Opponents of Reform Lean on Illogical Justification for Tax Breaks

Every Dollar Counts: Why It's time for Tax Expenditure Reform

 

Document Actions

2015-17 Legislative Agenda

Our 2015-17 Legislative Agenda calls for an equitable and sustainable revenue system in addition to state investments that will promote a world-class education system, sustain a strong, inclusive middle class, produce high quality, living wage jobs, and ensure equal opportunity to live healthy and productive lives.  Take a closer look here.

Budget Matters 2014

Thank you to those who made Budget Matters 2014 a success! Stay tuned for pictures, video clips and PowerPoints from this year's conference.

Legislative Testimony

Senior Budget Analyst Kim Justice recently testified before Senate Ways and Means against a bill that would fund education at the expense of other budget investments. Watch it here. 

Kim 5881