Three takeaways from the House budget proposal

Related Posts

How Washington’s tax code can help advance racial justice

Economic security programs help everyone thrive

Working Families Tax Relief Act is good for people who teach our kids and care for our loved ones

Tax credits for working families gaining steam in Washington and U.S.

A small bright spot in Washington’s tax code

Three takeaways from the House budget proposal

By - March 27, 2019

After reading through the House Democratic leaders’ budget proposal, we have a few high-level takeaways:

1. It shows that House leaders are serious about taking steps to rebalance our upside-down tax code (with one important caveat). As we said in our previous analysis, the best part of the House budget is how leaders propose to fund investments in our communities: namely, by responsibly closing the tax break on capital gains enjoyed by the very wealthiest Washingtonians and making our real estate excise tax more equitable. These are smart policies that will start to rebalance our state’s upside-down tax code and ease structural problems with our tax code for generations to come. The capital gains tax in particular will help to undo the legacy of wealth inequities that exist because of historically racist policies and systems.

The caveat: The House’s budget does little to fix the tax code for working families who are currently shouldering more than their fair share. While House leaders’ proposal to tax capital gains profits and high-value real estate would go a long way toward ensuring those at the very top are chipping in, it doesn’t actually do anything to rebalance our tax code for low- and moderate-income households. Funding the Working Families Tax Credit would provide a targeted tax break to thousands of low- and moderate-income working families struggling to keep up with the rising cost of living. To rebalance the tax code, we must address the top end of the income scale, as well as the bottom and middle. Failing to fund the Working Families Tax Credit is a huge missed opportunity in the House budget.

2. It includes smart investments to maintain current services, and makes some incremental improvements. In addition to prioritizing higher education, mental and behavioral health, and early learning:

  • The House leaders’ proposal provides funding to establish a first-in-the-nation public benefit to put affordable long-term care supports within reach for Washingtonians. The Long-Term Services and Support Trust program is a much-needed, innovative program that will address the ballooning cost of long-term care that a large and growing portion of Washington’s population will need in the very near future.
  • The budget includes funding for the 2020 census to promote an accurate and complete count in Washington. This is a smart investment that should go to community-based organizations to do outreach in historically undercounted communities, because an undercount would jeopardize funding for critical services that Washingtonians from all walks of life rely on – from schools to programs for seniors and people with low incomes.

3. There’s more work to be done, especially for those furthest from opportunity. Once again, the House is proposing to cut nearly $20 million from the WorkFirst/Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program – which provides cash assistance and supportive services to low-income families with children – to fund other parts of the budget. This cut is the result of the continuation of harsh time-limit and sanction policies, which push low-income families off WorkFirst even when they face crises like homelessness and mental illness – and disproportionately harm Black and Native American families.

The House budget does, however, provide $2 million to undo WorkFirst’s severe permanent disqualification policy, which bars families who face barriers to meeting program requirements from getting the support they need from the program. This is a first step toward reversing damaging cuts to the program. When the Senate releases its budget, it should build on the House’s proposal by removing all of the harsh sanctions that are currently cutting families off WorkFirst.